Our endorsement flows from the influence of Scripture as well as our living faith tradition. From Scripture we call to mind Luke’s parable of the “Good Samaritan.” The Samaritan finds a man “half dead,” is “moved with compassion,” and “treats him with mercy” by caring for him. The parable reminds us that the measure of a culture is the manner in which it provides for its weakest and most vulnerable. Likewise, the living faith tradition of the Catholic Church has long inspired us to support the principle that all people should have access to health care. At this time we are particularly concerned about those among the working poor who are unable to afford health insurance. As no likely alternative is evident we therefore endorse the expansion of Medicaid. But as noted above, the expansion of Medicaid also raises serious concerns:
- We are deeply troubled that the Medicaid program in Kansas covers contraception, sterilization, drugs that may induce abortion, and even, in rare cases, a small number of abortion procedures. It is simply unacceptable that the federal government insists on linking access to health care with taxpayer financing of these morally objectionable products and procedures. At a time when the federal government is coercing people to violate their consciences and religious teachings in order to participate in religious or charitable endeavors, it is difficult to embrace it further as a partner in providing health care.
- While the federal government has promised to pay 90% of the expansion costs, it is unlikely that the federal government will continue for very long to fund those individuals covered by the expansion at that much higher rate than it funds Medicaid for current recipients (approx. 56%). Kansas legislators need to make this commitment with their eyes wide open about what may be required financially of the State in the future.
- Medicaid is a program in need of reform, fiscal and otherwise. Maintaining a separate and inferior system of health insurance for the poor is far from ideal. Instead, it would be better if low-income Americans were supported in joining the health insurance networks in which the rest of society participates.
In summary, we have grave concerns about these and other aspects of Medicaid expansion and we acknowledge that people of good will can and do disagree about the issue of Medicaid expansion. Nevertheless, we do not believe that a nation that has been blessed with such abundance should leave so many of its poor without health insurance. With this in mind it is our hope that our Legislature will expand Medicaid to cover the needy in the short term, and that in the longer term, Congress will substantially reform the ACA and Medicaid in order to make them financially and morally responsible.